2007-08 Men's Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Clarkson | 22 | 33 | 15-4-3 | 0.750 | 72 | 49 | 39 | 22-13-4 | 0.615 | 108 | 95 | 5-4-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 28 | 14-8-0 | 0.636 | 75 | 57 | 35 | 21-14-0 | 0.600 | 112 | 95 | 6-4 | Lost 1 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 26 | 11-7-4 | 0.591 | 61 | 45 | 34 | 16-13-5 | 0.544 | 100 | 83 | 7-2-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Union | 22 | 25 | 10-7-5 | 0.568 | 51 | 57 | 35 | 15-14-6 | 0.514 | 80 | 91 | 3-5-2 | Lost 3 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 24 | 12-10-0 | 0.545 | 62 | 45 | 36 | 20-15-1 | 0.569 | 108 | 81 | 6-4 | Won 1 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 22 | 9-9-4 | 0.500 | 62 | 67 | 38 | 19-15-4 | 0.553 | 113 | 117 | 2-7 | Lost 1 | |
| Yale | 22 | 23 | 10-9-3 | 0.523 | 57 | 58 | 34 | 17-14-3 | 0.544 | 92 | 91 | 6-4 | Lost 1 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 21 | 8-9-5 | 0.477 | 58 | 55 | 42 | 18-18-6 | 0.500 | 113 | 104 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 14 | 6-14-2 | 0.318 | 53 | 69 | 37 | 12-21-4 | 0.378 | 98 | 110 | 4-6 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 21 | 13 | 5-13-3 | 0.310 | 38 | 65 | 37 | 10-23-4 | 0.324 | 72 | 109 | 2-7-1 | Lost 3 | |
| Brown | 22 | 15 | 6-13-3 | 0.341 | 49 | 68 | 30 | 6-20-4 | 0.267 | 65 | 101 | 3-7 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 21 | 18 | 7-10-4 | 0.429 | 62 | 65 | 31 | 13-13-5 | 0.500 | 96 | 94 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
Head to Head
| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-2 W, 5-0 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-3 W, 5-1 |
L, 4-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 6-3 W, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 2-1 |
T, 4-4 L, 3-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 2-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
XXX |
T, 1-1 T, 0-0 |
L, 4-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 5-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-2 L, 8-0 |
L, 5-2 L, 3-1 |
L, 5-4 W, 4-2 |
L, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
L, 1-0 W, 5-2 |
|
Colgate |
W, 5-2 L, 5-0 |
T, 1-1 T, 0-0 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 5-2 |
L, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 2-0 W, 7-2 |
T, 1-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-0 L, 4-0 |
L, 4-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-4 L, 8-0 |
W, 6-4 W, 6-1 |
|
Cornell |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
XXX |
L, 4-1 L, 6-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 5-3 L, 3-2 |
L, 2-1 L, 7-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 2-1 L, 5-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
W, 4-3 L, 5-1 |
W, 4-3 L, 5-1 |
T, 3-3 L, 5-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 6-0 |
XXX |
W, 1-0 T, 5-5 |
W, 5-2 W, 5-2 |
W, 5-3 L, 7-2 |
T, 4-4 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-1 T, 0-0 |
W, 6-3 W, 2-1 |
|
Harvard |
W, 4-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 1-0 T, 5-5 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-0 W, 4-2 |
L, 6-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 6-1 |
|
Princeton |
L, 6-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 2-0 L, 7-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 5-2 L, 5-2 |
L, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
W, 5-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-0 |
W, 4-3 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-3 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
|
Quinnipiac |
L, 6-3 L, 3-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 8-0 |
T, 1-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-3 W, 3-2 |
L, 5-3 W, 7-2 |
T, 3-3 W, 4-1 |
L, 5-2 W, 4-2 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-3 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-0 L, 5-1 |
|
Rensselaer |
T, 2-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 3-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 7-1 |
T, 4-4 |
W, 3-0 L, 4-2 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
L, 6-3 L, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-0 |
|
St. Lawrence |
T, 4-4 W, 3-1 |
W, 5-4 L, 4-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 6-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-3 L, 3-2 |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 6-3 W, 4-2 |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-3 |
|
Union |
T, 2-2 W, 2-0 |
W, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
L, 5-4 W, 8-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 T, 0-0 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-3 T, 3-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 L, 2-1 |
|
Yale |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 1-0 L, 5-2 |
L, 6-4 L, 6-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 5-1 |
L, 6-3 L, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 6-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-0 W, 5-1 |
T, 1-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-3 |
T, 3-3 W, 2-1 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding:
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins (League).
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
