2008-09 Men's Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Yale | 22 | 32 | 15-5-2 | 0.727 | 74 | 48 | 34 | 24-8-2 | 0.735 | 113 | 76 | 6-3-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 29 | 13-6-3 | 0.659 | 56 | 41 | 36 | 22-10-4 | 0.667 | 92 | 74 | 6-4 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 28 | 14-8-0 | 0.636 | 53 | 40 | 35 | 22-12-1 | 0.643 | 99 | 74 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 26 | 11-7-4 | 0.591 | 71 | 48 | 38 | 21-12-5 | 0.618 | 124 | 92 | 7-1-2 | Tied 1 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 24 | 9-7-6 | 0.545 | 54 | 56 | 31 | 9-16-6 | 0.387 | 68 | 96 | 4-4-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 24 | 11-9-2 | 0.545 | 63 | 60 | 31 | 14-14-3 | 0.500 | 88 | 87 | 3-7 | Lost 3 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 21 | 9-10-3 | 0.477 | 62 | 46 | 39 | 18-18-3 | 0.500 | 124 | 110 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Union | 22 | 20 | 9-11-2 | 0.455 | 56 | 64 | 39 | 19-17-3 | 0.526 | 111 | 107 | 5-4-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 20 | 8-10-4 | 0.455 | 58 | 68 | 36 | 10-19-7 | 0.375 | 88 | 115 | 3-5-2 | Lost 3 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 17 | 6-11-5 | 0.386 | 45 | 58 | 37 | 12-18-7 | 0.419 | 89 | 109 | 5-3-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 13 | 6-15-1 | 0.295 | 50 | 75 | 39 | 10-27-2 | 0.282 | 76 | 132 | 3-7 | Lost 2 | |
| Brown | 22 | 10 | 3-15-4 | 0.227 | 44 | 82 | 33 | 5-23-5 | 0.227 | 60 | 115 | 3-6-1 | Lost 2 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 4-3 |
L, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 5-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 5-1 W, 5-2 |
T, 3-3 T, 1-1 |
W, 5-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 5-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 7-2 W, 4-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 6-1 |
L, 5-4 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-3 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 3-1 L, 4-3 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 W, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 T, 0-0 |
W, 5-1 L, 6-3 |
W, 5-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 4-2 W, 5-3 |
W, 4-2 W, 5-3 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-3 |
|
Colgate |
W, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
T, 3-3 L, 3-1 |
XXX |
W, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 1-0 L, 1-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 1-0 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 4-2 |
W, 6-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-4 L, 3-2 |
|
Cornell |
L, 5-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 T, 0-0 |
L, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
L, 3-1 W, 5-4 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 1-0 W, 2-1 |
T, 0-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 1-0 W, 8-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-2 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 5-1 L, 5-2 |
L, 5-1 W, 6-3 |
L, 1-0 W, 1-0 |
W, 3-1 L, 5-4 |
XXX |
W, 4-1 T, 5-5 |
L, 4-0 L, 2-0 |
W, 6-0 W, 4-1 |
L, 5-2 L, 5-2 |
L, 4-3 W, 7-2 |
L, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
|
Harvard |
T, 3-3 T, 1-1 |
L, 5-1 T, 3-3 |
T, 2-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 4-1 T, 5-5 |
XXX |
W, 5-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 5-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 1-0 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 5-1 |
|
Princeton |
L, 5-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 5-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 1-0 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 2-0 |
L, 5-1 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
L, 2-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 5-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 L, 2-0 |
|
Quinnipiac |
L, 5-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-2 L, 5-3 |
W, 1-0 W, 3-2 |
T, 0-0 W, 2-1 |
L, 6-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 5-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-0 W, 2-1 |
XXX |
L, 5-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 5-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 6-3 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-0 T, 3-3 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 7-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 5-2 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 5-1 |
W, 5-1 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
L, 7-6 W, 2-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 7-3 W, 4-1 |
|
St. Lawrence |
T, 2-2 L, 6-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 1-0 L, 8-1 |
W, 4-3 L, 7-2 |
W, 1-0 T, 2-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
W, 5-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 7-6 L, 2-0 |
XXX |
L, 5-2 L, 2-0 |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
|
Union |
W, 5-4 L, 3-1 |
W, 4-3 L, 2-1 |
L, 6-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-2 |
W, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 6-3 L, 4-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 2-0 |
XXX |
L, 5-2 W, 4-2 |
|
Yale |
L, 3-0 L, 4-3 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-4 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 6-2 L, 5-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 2-0 |
L, 3-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 7-3 L, 4-1 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-2 L, 4-2 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
