2009-10 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Yale | 22 | 32 | 15-5-2 | 0.727 | 92 | 72 | 34 | 21-10-3 | 0.662 | 141 | 105 | 6-4 | Lost 1 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 31 | 14-5-3 | 0.705 | 74 | 43 | 34 | 21-9-4 | 0.676 | 107 | 67 | 7-2-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Union | 22 | 28 | 12-6-4 | 0.636 | 81 | 60 | 39 | 21-12-6 | 0.615 | 134 | 100 | 5-5 | Lost 1 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 26 | 12-8-2 | 0.591 | 78 | 70 | 36 | 15-15-6 | 0.500 | 118 | 119 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 23 | 9-8-5 | 0.523 | 62 | 61 | 42 | 19-16-7 | 0.536 | 118 | 121 | 5-4-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 23 | 10-9-3 | 0.523 | 64 | 58 | 39 | 18-17-4 | 0.513 | 109 | 108 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 22 | 11-11-0 | 0.500 | 71 | 63 | 40 | 20-18-2 | 0.525 | 123 | 114 | 5-5 | Lost 2 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 65 | 76 | 31 | 12-16-3 | 0.435 | 91 | 103 | 3-6-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 17 | 7-12-3 | 0.386 | 61 | 70 | 33 | 9-21-3 | 0.318 | 82 | 113 | 3-7 | Lost 2 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 17 | 7-12-3 | 0.386 | 69 | 79 | 32 | 10-19-3 | 0.359 | 96 | 115 | 4-3-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Brown | 22 | 16 | 6-12-4 | 0.364 | 64 | 95 | 37 | 13-20-4 | 0.405 | 103 | 134 | 5-5 | Won 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 11 | 4-15-3 | 0.250 | 50 | 84 | 37 | 9-24-4 | 0.297 | 92 | 136 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 5-3 W, 6-2 |
W, 6-0 W, 5-3 |
W, 9-4 T, 5-5 |
L, 4-1 W, 5-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 7-3 |
L, 2-1 W, 8-3 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 6-5 W, 8-5 |
|
Clarkson |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
W, 6-2 W, 6-1 |
W, 3-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
T, 2-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-1 W, 11-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 5-4 |
|
Colgate |
L, 5-3 L, 6-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 6-1 |
XXX |
W, 4-2 W, 6-2 |
L, 3-2 T, 6-6 |
L, 5-4 L, 4-2 |
L, 5-4 L, 3-1 |
W, 5-3 W, 2-0 |
L, 5-3 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 L, 5-2 |
T, 3-3 W, 6-3 |
|
Cornell |
L, 6-0 L, 5-3 |
L, 3-1 L, 5-3 |
L, 4-2 L, 6-2 |
XXX |
L, 5-1 W, 5-4 |
L, 6-3 L, 3-0 |
L, 5-2 W, 5-3 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-0 |
L, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
T, 1-1 L, 2-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 2-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 9-4 T, 5-5 |
W, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
W, 3-2 T, 6-6 |
W, 5-1 L, 5-4 |
XXX |
W, 5-3 W, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 5-3 |
W, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 5-4 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-2 |
|
Harvard |
W, 4-1 L, 5-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 5-4 W, 4-2 |
W, 6-3 W, 3-0 |
L, 5-3 L, 4-1 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 W, 2-1 |
W, 5-1 L, 3-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 5-4 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 3-2 W, 6-3 |
|
Princeton |
W, 3-1 L, 7-3 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-4 W, 3-1 |
W, 5-2 L, 5-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 5-3 |
T, 3-3 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
W, 5-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-1 L, 7-0 |
W, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 7-3 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 7-4 |
|
Quinnipiac |
W, 2-1 L, 8-3 |
L, 4-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 5-3 L, 2-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 2-0 |
L, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-1 W, 4-3 |
XXX |
W, 4-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 5-2 L, 5-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 7-3 |
W, 7-4 L, 4-3 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 3-1 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-3 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-3 |
T, 3-3 L, 5-4 |
L, 4-1 W, 7-0 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-3 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 5-4 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-2 L, 4-0 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-2 |
T, 1-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-3 |
L, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-2 W, 5-0 |
L, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
XXX |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
L, 4-2 W, 7-5 |
|
Union |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
L, 5-1 L, 11-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 5-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 5-4 |
W, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
L, 7-3 L, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 7-3 |
L, 5-4 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 W, 4-3 |
|
Yale |
L, 6-5 L, 8-5 |
L, 3-2 L, 5-4 |
T, 3-3 L, 6-3 |
L, 4-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 6-3 |
L, 4-1 L, 7-4 |
L, 7-4 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-2 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-2 L, 7-5 |
T, 3-3 L, 4-3 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
