2009-10 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 32 15-5-2 0.727 92 72 34 21-10-3 0.662 141 105 6-4 Lost 1
22 31 14-5-3 0.705 74 43 34 21-9-4 0.676 107 67 7-2-1 Lost 1
22 28 12-6-4 0.636 81 60 39 21-12-6 0.615 134 100 5-5 Lost 1
22 26 12-8-2 0.591 78 70 36 15-15-6 0.500 118 119 4-5-1 Lost 2
22 23 9-8-5 0.523 62 61 42 19-16-7 0.536 118 121 5-4-1 Lost 2
22 23 10-9-3 0.523 64 58 39 18-17-4 0.513 109 108 4-5-1 Lost 1
22 22 11-11-0 0.500 71 63 40 20-18-2 0.525 123 114 5-5 Lost 2
22 18 8-12-2 0.409 65 76 31 12-16-3 0.435 91 103 3-6-1 Lost 2
22 17 7-12-3 0.386 61 70 33 9-21-3 0.318 82 113 3-7 Lost 2
22 17 7-12-3 0.386 69 79 32 10-19-3 0.359 96 115 4-3-3 Lost 1
22 16 6-12-4 0.364 64 95 37 13-20-4 0.405 103 134 5-5 Won 1
22 11 4-15-3 0.250 50 84 37 9-24-4 0.297 92 136 4-5-1 Lost 1

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-3
W, 6-2
W, 6-0
W, 5-3
W, 9-4
T, 5-5
L, 4-1
W, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 7-3
L, 2-1
W, 8-3
W, 3-1
L, 4-3
W, 5-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 6-5
W, 8-5
Clarkson
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
XXX W, 6-2
W, 6-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-3
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-1
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-3
W, 5-1
W, 11-2
W, 3-2
W, 5-4
Colgate
L, 5-3
L, 6-2
L, 6-2
L, 6-1
XXX W, 4-2
W, 6-2
L, 3-2
T, 6-6
L, 5-4
L, 4-2
L, 5-4
L, 3-1
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
L, 5-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
T, 3-3
W, 6-3
Cornell
L, 6-0
L, 5-3
L, 3-1
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
L, 6-2
XXX L, 5-1
W, 5-4
L, 6-3
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
W, 5-3
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 2-1
Dartmouth
L, 9-4
T, 5-5
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 6-6
W, 5-1
L, 5-4
XXX W, 5-3
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
W, 4-2
Harvard
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
W, 6-3
W, 3-0
L, 5-3
L, 4-1
XXX T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
L, 3-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-4
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
W, 6-3
Princeton
W, 3-1
L, 7-3
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-4
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 5-3
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
XXX W, 5-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 7-0
W, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 7-3
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 7-4
Quinnipiac
W, 2-1
L, 8-3
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 5-3
L, 2-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
W, 4-3
L, 5-1
W, 3-1
L, 5-1
W, 4-3
XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-3
L, 5-2
L, 5-0
W, 2-1
W, 7-3
W, 7-4
L, 4-3
Rensselaer
L, 3-1
W, 4-3
L, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-3
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
L, 5-4
L, 4-1
W, 7-0
L, 4-1
L, 5-3
XXX W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-4
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 4-0
St. Lawrence
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-2
W, 5-0
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
XXX W, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 7-5
Union
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
L, 11-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
L, 5-4
W, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 7-3
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 7-3
L, 5-4
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
XXX T, 3-3
W, 4-3
Yale
L, 6-5
L, 8-5
L, 3-2
L, 5-4
T, 3-3
L, 6-3
L, 4-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 6-3
L, 4-1
L, 7-4
L, 7-4
W, 4-3
W, 5-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
L, 7-5
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.