2010-11 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Union | 22 | 36 | 17-3-2 | 0.818 | 75 | 43 | 40 | 26-10-4 | 0.700 | 144 | 84 | 6-3-1 | Lost 3 | |
| Yale | 22 | 35 | 17-4-1 | 0.795 | 84 | 46 | 36 | 28-7-1 | 0.792 | 151 | 74 | 7-2-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 26 | 12-8-2 | 0.591 | 70 | 48 | 34 | 19-12-3 | 0.603 | 111 | 87 | 5-5 | Won 1 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 24 | 11-9-2 | 0.545 | 67 | 52 | 38 | 20-13-5 | 0.592 | 110 | 90 | 2-7-1 | Lost 3 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 24 | 11-9-2 | 0.545 | 69 | 70 | 32 | 17-13-2 | 0.562 | 105 | 88 | 3-6-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 24 | 11-9-2 | 0.545 | 57 | 53 | 34 | 16-15-3 | 0.515 | 86 | 88 | 5-5 | Lost 1 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 19 | 6-9-7 | 0.432 | 49 | 62 | 39 | 16-15-8 | 0.513 | 95 | 102 | 3-4-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 19 | 9-12-1 | 0.432 | 58 | 78 | 36 | 15-19-2 | 0.444 | 98 | 117 | 3-7 | Lost 2 | |
| Brown | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 55 | 70 | 31 | 10-16-5 | 0.403 | 83 | 107 | 3-6-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 15 | 7-14-1 | 0.341 | 49 | 61 | 34 | 12-21-1 | 0.368 | 77 | 98 | 7-3 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 13 | 6-15-1 | 0.295 | 53 | 73 | 40 | 13-22-5 | 0.388 | 101 | 124 | 4-6 | Lost 2 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 11 | 4-15-3 | 0.250 | 51 | 81 | 42 | 11-28-3 | 0.298 | 107 | 142 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 5-2 L, 6-4 |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 3-0 |
L, 4-3 W, 2-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 7-3 |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 3-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 5-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
W, 5-2 L, 3-2 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 3-1 L, 4-1 |
XXX |
T, 4-4 W, 4-2 |
W, 6-1 W, 5-2 |
W, 7-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-3 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-3 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-2 W, 5-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 8-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-2 W, 6-3 |
|
Colgate |
W, 5-2 W, 6-4 |
T, 4-4 L, 4-2 |
XXX |
T, 1-1 W, 5-2 |
W, 7-3 L, 5-3 |
W, 6-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 5-4 |
W, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 6-3 |
W, 6-4 T, 1-1 |
|
Cornell |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 6-1 L, 5-2 |
T, 1-1 L, 5-2 |
XXX |
T, 2-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 5-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-0 L, 4-3 |
W, 5-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 3-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 7-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 7-3 W, 5-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
L, 8-2 L, 5-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 2-0 L, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-1 |
L, 6-1 L, 4-2 |
T, 0-0 L, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-2 |
|
Harvard |
W, 4-3 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 6-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 8-2 W, 5-2 |
XXX |
W, 1-0 T, 4-4 |
W, 5-4 W, 3-1 |
L, 1-0 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 1-0 |
|
Princeton |
L, 4-3 L, 7-3 |
W, 5-3 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-3 L, 5-4 |
L, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 1-0 T, 4-4 |
XXX |
L, 3-0 T, 1-1 |
W, 5-2 L, 4-3 |
L, 5-1 L, 5-3 |
W, 7-4 W, 5-0 |
W, 5-3 W, 5-4 |
|
Quinnipiac |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-3 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 2-0 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-4 L, 3-1 |
W, 3-0 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 6-4 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-1 W, 6-1 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 6-2 L, 3-0 |
W, 3-2 L, 5-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 5-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-1 |
W, 1-0 L, 3-2 |
L, 5-2 W, 4-3 |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
L, 5-3 W, 5-3 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-2 L, 5-2 |
|
St. Lawrence |
W, 2-1 W, 5-1 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-0 W, 4-3 |
W, 6-1 W, 4-2 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 6-4 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-3 L, 5-3 |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 5-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
|
Union |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
L, 8-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 6-3 |
L, 5-1 L, 4-0 |
T, 0-0 W, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 7-4 L, 5-0 |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-3 |
L, 3-1 L, 5-2 |
XXX |
W, 5-0 L, 3-2 |
|
Yale |
L, 5-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 5-2 L, 6-3 |
L, 6-4 T, 1-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 4-2 L, 1-0 |
L, 5-3 L, 5-4 |
L, 5-1 L, 6-1 |
L, 4-2 W, 5-2 |
L, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 5-0 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
