2017-18 Standings Presented by U.S. Army ROTC

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
1. Cornell 36 17-3-2 0.818 22 61 32 25-6-2 0.788 33 102 52 6-3-1 Lost 2
2. Union 33 16-5-1 0.750 22 70 48 21-15-2 0.579 38 115 98 6-3-1 Lost 2
3, Clarkson 29 12-5-5 0.659 22 74 49 23-11-6 0.650 40 122 75 4-5-1 Lost 2
4. Harvard 25 11-8-3 0.568 22 68 50 15-14-4 0.515 33 104 85 5-5 Lost 1
5. (t) Dartmouth 23 11-10-1 0.523 22 55 69 16-17-2 0.486 35 83 107 6-4 Lost 2
5. (t) Colgate 23 10-9-3 0.523 22 49 46 17-17-6 0.500 40 87 88 5-4-1 Lost 2
7. Princeton 22 10-10-2 0.500 22 77 79 19-13-4 0.583 36 131 110 7-2-1 Lost 1
8. Yale 21 10-11-1 0.477 22 67 59 15-15-1 0.500 31 87 88 6-4 Lost 2
9. Quinnipiac 20 9-11-2 0.455 22 59 56 16-18-4 0.474 38 105 106 5-5 Lost 2
10. Brown 15 7-14-1 0.341 22 45 63 8-19-4 0.323 31 67 104 2-7-1 Lost 2
11. Rensselaer 10 4-16-2 0.227 22 45 86 6-27-4 0.216 37 73 129 2-8 Lost 1
12. St. Lawrence 7 3-18-1 0.159 22 43 76 8-27-2 0.243 37 80 122 2-8 Lost 1
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
L, 6-4
L, 3-0
W, 7-2
W, 5-0
W, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
L, 4-1
W, 5-2
Clarkson
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
XXX L, 5-2
T, 4-4
L, 4-0
T, 0-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
T, 6-6
W, 5-2
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
Colgate
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
T, 4-4
XXX W, 2-0
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
T, 0-0
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-3
Cornell
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
T, 0-0
L, 2-0
L, 2-0
XXX L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 7-1
L, 2-1
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
Dartmouth
L, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
XXX W, 5-0
W, 4-1
W, 9-2
W, 6-3
T, 0-0
L, 4-3
L, 6-5
L, 7-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-4
Harvard
L, 3-0
W, 6-4
T, 6-6
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-1
XXX L, 5-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-0
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
Princeton
W, 3-0
L, 7-2
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
T, 0-0
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
W, 7-1
L, 9-2
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 6-2
L, 5-3
L, 6-2
L, 7-2
L, 5-4
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 5-4
W, 7-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
W, 1-0
T, 0-0
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
W, 5-3
XXX W, 5-3
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
Rensselaer
W, 5-4
W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 6-5
W, 7-3
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 6-2
W, 7-2
L, 5-3
W, 4-1
XXX T, 4-4
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
St. Lawrence
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 6-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
T, 4-4
W, 2-1
XXX W, 3-1
W, 5-4
W, 6-1
L, 1-0
Union
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 4-3
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-4
XXX W, 5-3
L, 3-2
Yale
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 6-4
L, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-4
L, 7-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 6-1
W, 1-0
L, 5-3
W, 3-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.