2007-08 Women's Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Harvard | 22 | 43 | 21-0-1 | 0.977 | 84 | 20 | 34 | 31-2-1 | 0.926 | 123 | 38 | 9-1 | Lost 1 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 35 | 17-4-1 | 0.795 | 97 | 42 | 39 | 27-11-1 | 0.705 | 152 | 78 | 8-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Dartmouth | 21 | 32 | 14-3-4 | 0.762 | 80 | 42 | 32 | 18-8-6 | 0.656 | 108 | 80 | 6-2-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 29 | 13-6-3 | 0.659 | 66 | 35 | 38 | 24-9-5 | 0.697 | 107 | 54 | 6-3-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 25 | 11-8-3 | 0.568 | 66 | 53 | 32 | 14-12-6 | 0.531 | 80 | 68 | 4-4-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 22 | 9-9-4 | 0.500 | 53 | 51 | 34 | 12-17-5 | 0.426 | 83 | 89 | 3-6-1 | Lost 4 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 21 | 10-11-1 | 0.477 | 57 | 73 | 28 | 12-15-1 | 0.446 | 75 | 92 | 3-7 | Lost 4 | |
| Yale | 22 | 18 | 7-11-4 | 0.409 | 45 | 60 | 31 | 10-15-6 | 0.419 | 65 | 80 | 2-6-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 21 | 15 | 6-12-3 | 0.357 | 37 | 56 | 32 | 13-15-4 | 0.469 | 70 | 72 | 2-7 | Lost 3 | |
| Brown | 22 | 12 | 4-14-4 | 0.273 | 36 | 62 | 29 | 5-19-5 | 0.259 | 52 | 85 | 2-6-2 | Won 2 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 8 | 2-16-4 | 0.182 | 33 | 92 | 34 | 5-24-5 | 0.221 | 57 | 141 | 2-7-1 | Lost 4 | |
| Union | 22 | 2 | 0-20-2 | 0.045 | 16 | 84 | 32 | 3-27-2 | 0.125 | 32 | 128 | 0-10 | Lost 10 | |
Head to Head
| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 2-1 W, 5-0 |
W, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 5-1 |
W, 2-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 2-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 2-0 T, 2-2 |
L, 6-1 W, 5-4 |
W, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 1-0 L, 3-1 |
W, 3-0 T, 2-2 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 2-1 L, 5-0 |
XXX |
L, 3-1 T, 1-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-3 |
W, 3-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 5-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 7-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-0 |
W, 3-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 6-0 |
L, 6-0 L, 5-1 |
|
Colgate |
L, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 3-1 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-2 |
L, 5-2 T, 1-1 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 5-3 L, 5-2 |
L, 5-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
|
Cornell |
T, 2-2 L, 5-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
XXX |
W, 8-0 W, 5-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 7-4 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 6-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-0 W, 5-0 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 2-0 L, 4-2 |
L, 3-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 8-0 L, 5-1 |
XXX |
T, 5-5 W, 4-0 |
L, 4-3 T, 2-2 |
L, 8-1 L, 6-0 |
L, 6-4 |
L, 4-3 W, 5-2 |
L, 2-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
|
Harvard |
L, 2-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 5-0 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 4-2 |
T, 5-5 L, 4-0 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-0 |
L, 5-2 L, 5-0 |
L, 5-1 L, 2-0 |
L, 6-0 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-0 |
|
Princeton |
L, 2-0 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-2 |
W, 7-4 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
T, 1-1 L, 6-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-1 W, 9-2 |
L, 7-0 L, 7-0 |
W, 5-3 L, 2-1 |
|
Quinnipiac |
W, 6-1 L, 5-4 |
W, 3-1 W, 7-1 |
W, 5-2 T, 1-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-3 |
W, 8-1 W, 6-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-0 |
T, 1-1 W, 6-2 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 6-1 W, 9-1 |
T, 0-0 L, 2-1 |
W, 5-2 T, 3-3 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-0 |
T, 1-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-1 |
W, 6-4 |
W, 5-2 W, 5-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-0 |
XXX |
W, 3-0 W, 3-0 |
L, 1-0 T, 4-4 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-2 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 6-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 5-3 W, 5-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 6-2 |
W, 4-3 L, 5-2 |
W, 5-1 W, 2-0 |
L, 3-1 L, 9-2 |
L, 6-1 L, 9-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-0 |
XXX |
L, 7-0 L, 7-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 5-3 |
|
Union |
W, 1-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 6-0 |
W, 5-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 6-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 7-0 W, 7-0 |
T, 0-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 1-0 T, 4-4 |
W, 7-0 W, 7-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
|
Yale |
L, 3-0 T, 2-2 |
W, 6-0 W, 5-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-0 L, 5-0 |
W, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-0 |
L, 5-3 W, 2-1 |
L, 5-2 T, 3-3 |
T, 1-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding:
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins (League).
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
