2008-09 Women's Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Harvard | 22 | 34 | 16-4-2 | 0.773 | 70 | 37 | 32 | 19-10-3 | 0.641 | 95 | 54 | 7-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 30 | 13-5-4 | 0.682 | 79 | 46 | 34 | 20-10-4 | 0.647 | 125 | 85 | 4-4-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 31 | 15-6-1 | 0.705 | 64 | 39 | 31 | 18-11-2 | 0.613 | 79 | 58 | 6-3-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 21 | 8-9-5 | 0.477 | 65 | 57 | 31 | 12-14-5 | 0.468 | 92 | 79 | 2-5-3 | Lost 2 | |
| Yale | 22 | 17 | 8-13-1 | 0.386 | 38 | 50 | 29 | 12-16-1 | 0.431 | 53 | 61 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Brown | 22 | 12 | 6-16-0 | 0.273 | 33 | 71 | 29 | 7-21-1 | 0.259 | 40 | 91 | 4-6 | Won 1 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 33 | 16-5-1 | 0.750 | 67 | 41 | 38 | 24-11-3 | 0.671 | 115 | 82 | 6-4 | Lost 2 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 27 | 12-7-3 | 0.614 | 57 | 48 | 36 | 19-14-3 | 0.569 | 103 | 100 | 5-5 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 25 | 11-8-3 | 0.568 | 53 | 51 | 37 | 19-14-4 | 0.568 | 86 | 83 | 7-2-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 24 | 10-8-4 | 0.545 | 51 | 38 | 36 | 16-14-6 | 0.528 | 94 | 70 | 3-6-1 | Lost 3 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 9 | 2-15-5 | 0.205 | 29 | 55 | 34 | 3-26-5 | 0.162 | 44 | 108 | 0-8-2 | Lost 5 | |
| Union | 22 | 1 | 0-21-1 | 0.023 | 15 | 88 | 34 | 2-29-3 | 0.103 | 34 | 129 | 0-10 | Lost 13 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 6-0 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 5-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 6-0 |
W, 9-1 W, 1-0 |
W, 5-3 W, 4-0 |
L, 2-1 W, 3-0 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-1 |
W, 5-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 2-0 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 6-0 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
T, 2-2 T, 1-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
T, 2-2 T, 4-4 |
L, 2-0 W, 6-1 |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 2-0 L, 2-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 6-0 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
|
Colgate |
W, 4-3 L, 5-0 |
T, 2-2 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
L, 2-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 7-2 L, 2-1 |
T, 5-5 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 3-0 |
|
Cornell |
L, 3-2 L, 6-0 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-3 |
XXX |
W, 5-4 T, 3-3 |
W, 5-1 W, 5-2 |
W, 6-3 T, 2-2 |
T, 2-2 T, 4-4 |
L, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
T, 4-4 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 8-0 |
L, 3-0 W, 3-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 9-1 L, 1-0 |
T, 2-2 T, 4-4 |
L, 7-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 5-4 T, 3-3 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 L, 3-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 3-0 T, 1-1 |
L, 5-0 L, 8-4 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-3 |
L, 6-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 5-2 L, 3-2 |
|
Harvard |
L, 5-3 L, 4-0 |
W, 2-0 L, 6-1 |
T, 5-5 L, 2-1 |
L, 5-1 L, 5-2 |
L, 3-2 W, 3-0 |
XXX |
L, 6-4 W, 1-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
T, 1-1 L, 5-4 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 5-0 L, 5-1 |
L, 1-0 L, 2-1 |
|
Princeton |
W, 2-1 L, 3-0 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 6-3 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 6-4 L, 1-0 |
XXX |
L, 4-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 6-0 L, 3-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
|
Quinnipiac |
W, 3-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 2-0 W, 2-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
T, 2-2 T, 4-4 |
W, 3-0 T, 1-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 2-1 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 2-0 W, 6-2 |
L, 4-1 T, 1-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 1-0 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 5-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
W, 5-0 W, 8-4 |
T, 1-1 W, 5-4 |
L, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
L, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
XXX |
W, 5-3 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
T, 4-4 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-3 |
L, 3-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 2-0 L, 6-2 |
L, 5-3 L, 3-2 |
XXX |
L, 4-1 L, 5-1 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-0 |
|
Union |
W, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-0 W, 6-0 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 8-0 |
W, 6-1 W, 4-2 |
W, 5-0 W, 5-1 |
W, 6-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 T, 1-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-1 |
XXX |
W, 4-0 W, 4-0 |
|
Yale |
L, 4-1 L, 2-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 3-0 |
W, 3-0 L, 3-1 |
W, 5-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 1-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 1-0 |
W, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-0 |
L, 4-0 L, 4-0 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
