2009-10 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 34 14-2-6 0.773 67 26 36 21-9-6 0.667 103 63 9-1 Lost 1
22 31 14-5-3 0.705 47 28 40 23-12-5 0.638 104 69 3-5-2 Lost 2
22 29 13-6-3 0.659 69 40 33 20-8-5 0.682 94 54 6-3-1 Lost 2
22 29 11-4-7 0.659 44 28 37 19-10-8 0.622 79 51 6-2-2 Lost 2
22 26 11-7-4 0.591 56 42 37 16-15-6 0.514 87 77 5-5 Lost 1
22 26 11-7-4 0.591 52 42 31 13-14-4 0.484 72 70 4-5-1 Lost 2
22 25 11-8-3 0.568 50 41 37 16-14-7 0.527 88 85 5-5 Lost 1
22 20 8-10-4 0.455 51 68 36 12-20-4 0.389 86 129 5-5 Lost 2
22 19 9-12-1 0.432 70 60 28 12-14-2 0.464 90 78 6-4 Lost 1
22 17 8-13-1 0.386 36 55 29 10-16-3 0.397 56 75 4-6 Lost 3
22 5 1-18-3 0.114 22 73 28 3-21-4 0.179 41 95 1-9 Lost 1
22 3 1-20-1 0.068 14 75 34 5-28-1 0.162 36 110 0-10 Lost 10

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 1-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 4-0
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-0
L, 4-3
T, 0-0
W, 8-1
T, 1-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
T, 0-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
Clarkson
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
XXX L, 4-1
L, 3-0
W, 2-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
L, 3-2
Colgate
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
XXX T, 3-3
W, 6-0
T, 5-5
L, 6-4
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-3
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 10-4
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
Cornell
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 6-0
XXX L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 4-4
L, 1-0
L, 6-0
T, 3-3
T, 0-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-0
L, 6-1
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
Dartmouth
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
T, 5-5
W, 6-4
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
XXX W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-2
W, 4-3
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 6-2
L, 6-3
Harvard
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
L, 5-1
W, 4-3
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
XXX W, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 7-2
W, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
L, 5-0
L, 4-3
Princeton
L, 5-0
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 1-0
L, 3-2
W, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 6-0
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
XXX T, 2-2
L, 1-0
T, 2-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 6-3
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 4-0
Quinnipiac
T, 0-0
L, 8-1
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
T, 0-0
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 7-2
L, 1-0
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
XXX L, 6-1
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 1-0
Rensselaer
T, 1-1
L, 2-0
T, 1-1
L, 3-1
L, 10-4
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
T, 1-1
W, 6-1
L, 1-0
XXX W, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
St. Lawrence
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 3-0
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
XXX L, 3-1
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
W, 1-0
Union
T, 0-0
L, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-1
W, 8-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-3
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 5-0
XXX W, 2-1
W, 3-0
Yale
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
W, 6-2
W, 6-3
W, 5-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-0
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-0
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.