2010-11 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Cornell | 22 | 41 | 20-1-1 | 0.932 | 99 | 20 | 35 | 31-3-1 | 0.900 | 157 | 39 | 8-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 31 | 14-5-3 | 0.705 | 68 | 43 | 32 | 17-11-4 | 0.594 | 97 | 76 | 5-3-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 30 | 15-7-0 | 0.682 | 74 | 51 | 34 | 22-12-0 | 0.647 | 112 | 81 | 7-3 | Lost 2 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 27 | 13-8-1 | 0.614 | 51 | 42 | 31 | 16-14-1 | 0.532 | 68 | 64 | 6-4 | Lost 2 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 25 | 12-9-1 | 0.568 | 58 | 43 | 37 | 22-12-3 | 0.635 | 105 | 63 | 5-3-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 24 | 10-8-4 | 0.545 | 50 | 46 | 37 | 14-17-6 | 0.459 | 76 | 85 | 3-4-3 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 22 | 11-11-0 | 0.500 | 51 | 48 | 36 | 16-18-2 | 0.472 | 90 | 96 | 4-6 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 43 | 55 | 35 | 10-18-7 | 0.386 | 63 | 97 | 1-8-1 | Lost 6 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 39 | 62 | 33 | 11-19-3 | 0.379 | 63 | 95 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Yale | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 42 | 54 | 29 | 9-17-3 | 0.362 | 52 | 73 | 4-5-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Brown | 22 | 6 | 1-17-4 | 0.136 | 28 | 81 | 29 | 2-23-4 | 0.138 | 38 | 114 | 0-9-1 | Tied 1 | |
| Union | 22 | 4 | 1-19-2 | 0.091 | 18 | 76 | 34 | 2-29-3 | 0.103 | 33 | 109 | 1-9 | Lost 4 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
T, 1-1 W, 5-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 8-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 6-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 4-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 1-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 5-2 W, 4-2 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-2 |
|
Clarkson |
T, 1-1 L, 5-3 |
XXX |
W, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
W, 2-0 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-0 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
|
Colgate |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 5-2 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
W, 6-1 W, 5-0 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-3 |
W, 3-1 W, 7-0 |
W, 2-0 L, 2-0 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 5-4 L, 2-0 |
W, 5-3 W, 4-2 |
L, 1-0 L, 1-0 |
W, 3-1 L, 1-0 |
|
Cornell |
L, 3-0 L, 8-0 |
L, 3-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 6-1 L, 5-0 |
XXX |
L, 6-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 4-3 |
L, 5-1 L, 1-0 |
L, 5-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 6-1 L, 6-0 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 8-0 |
L, 5-0 L, 7-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 4-2 L, 6-0 |
W, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 6-1 L, 4-2 |
XXX |
W, 5-3 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 7-0 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-0 |
W, 5-2 L, 3-0 |
W, 4-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 2-1 |
|
Harvard |
L, 4-2 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-2 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-1 L, 7-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-3 |
L, 5-3 L, 3-2 |
XXX |
T, 2-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 5-0 L, 4-0 |
T, 3-3 L, 5-3 |
|
Princeton |
L, 4-0 L, 4-2 |
L, 2-0 W, 3-2 |
L, 2-0 W, 2-0 |
W, 5-1 W, 1-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 7-0 |
T, 2-2 L, 3-2 |
XXX |
W, 5-2 L, 3-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
|
Quinnipiac |
L, 4-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-0 |
W, 5-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-0 |
L, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 5-2 W, 3-0 |
XXX |
W, 2-0 L, 5-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-1 W, 1-0 |
|
Rensselaer |
W, 1-0 L, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 5-4 W, 2-0 |
W, 6-1 W, 6-0 |
L, 5-2 W, 3-0 |
L, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 2-0 W, 5-1 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 5-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 2-1 |
L, 5-3 L, 4-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
L, 1-0 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-0 |
|
Union |
T, 1-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 3-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 1-0 W, 1-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 8-0 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-1 |
W, 5-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 1-0 W, 4-0 |
XXX |
W, 4-1 W, 5-0 |
|
Yale |
L, 4-0 L, 4-2 |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 1-0 |
W, 5-0 W, 7-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 5-3 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 1-0 |
W, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-0 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-0 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
