2017-18 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Brown 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
Clarkson 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 5-0-1 0.917 6 17 6 5-0-1 Won 5
Colgate 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 4-0-0 1.000 4 16 2 4-0 Won 4
Cornell 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
Dartmouth 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
Harvard 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
Princeton 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
Quinnipiac 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 4-3-0 0.571 7 14 14 4-3 Lost 1
Rensselaer 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 2-4-0 0.333 6 11 15 2-4 Won 2
St. Lawrence 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 2-0-2 0.750 4 7 3 2-0-2 Tied 1
Union 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-5-1 0.083 6 6 29 0-5-1 Lost 3
Yale 0 0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0-0 0.000 0 0 0 0-0 -
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX





















Clarkson


XXX



















Colgate




XXX

















Cornell






XXX















Dartmouth








XXX













Harvard










XXX











Princeton












XXX









Quinnipiac














XXX







Rensselaer
















XXX




St. Lawrence


















XXX



Union



















XXX

Yale






















XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.