2017-18 Standings Presented by U.S. Army ROTC

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
1. (1) Clarkson 38 19-3 0.864 22 90 29 36-4-1 0.890 41 158 48 10-0 Won 10
1. (t) Colgate 38 19-3 0.864 22 80 35 34-6-1 0.841 41 150 70 8-2 Lost 1
3. Cornell 32 15-5-2 0.727 22 66 42 21-9-3 0.682 33 100 65 8-2 Lost 1
4. St. Lawrence 30 14-6-2 0.682 22 67 40 20-11-4 0.629 35 96 73 6-3-1 Lost 1
5. Quinnipiac 25 12-9-1 0.568 22 41 40 16-17-3 0.486 36 65 71 3-6-1 Lost 3
6. Princeton 23 11-10-1 0.523 22 60 43 14-14-4 0.500 32 79 64 6-4 Lost 1
7. Harvard 22 10-10-2 0.500 22 52 48 13-16-2 0.452 31 79 88 4-5-1 Lost 3
8. Yale 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 43 53 10-17-4 0.387 31 59 83 3-7 Lost 2
9. Rensselaer 15 6-13-3 0.341 22 35 50 9-19-6 0.353 34 54 78 2-7-1 Lost 3
10. Union 12 5-15-2 0.273 22 45 78 7-22-5 0.279 34 65 121 1-7-2 Lost 2
11. Dartmouth 9 3-16-3 0.205 22 25 77 5-19-3 0.241 27 37 98 1-7-2 Lost 2
12. Brown 2 1-21 0.045 22 31 100 2-27-0 0.069 29 46 134 0-10 Lost 15
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 11-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 6-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
W, 6-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 6-3
W, 5-1
W, 6-3
W, 5-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-0
Clarkson
L, 11-1
L, 4-0
XXX W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 6-0
L, 4-3
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 7-3
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
Colgate
L, 5-3
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
W, 5-3
XXX W, 2-1
L, 5-4
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 2-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 6-1
L, 6-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
Cornell
L, 5-1
L, 6-1
W, 6-0
W, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 5-4
XXX L, 2-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 5-2
W, 4-0
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
Dartmouth
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 8-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-1
XXX W, 4-1
W, 1-0
W, 8-1
W, 3-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
T, 1-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 6-0
Harvard
L, 6-3
L, 6-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
Princeton
L, 4-0
L, 5-2
W, 4-0
L, 2-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 8-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
XXX L, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
Quinnipiac
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-0
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
W, 2-0
W, 2-0
Rensselaer
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
XXX W, 1-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
St. Lawrence
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-0
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
W, 2-1
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
XXX L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
Union
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
W, 5-1
W, 7-3
W, 6-1
W, 6-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-0
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
XXX L, 3-1
W, 5-4
Yale
L, 4-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 6-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 2-0
L, 2-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-4
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.